bushman and anderson 2002 | 1.28 | 0.5 | 6269 | 25 | 31 |
bushman and anderson 2001 | 1.61 | 1 | 884 | 25 | 22 |
anderson & bushman 2002 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 1547 | 23 | 95 |
burnham and anderson 2002 | 1.55 | 0.2 | 7180 | 25 | 6 |
bushman and smith 2001 | 0.97 | 0.5 | 3059 | 22 | 26 |
bushman et al. 2004 | 1.43 | 0.1 | 6540 | 19 | 99 |
burnham and anderson 2004 | 1.04 | 0.7 | 5723 | 25 | 28 |
tushman and anderson 1986 | 1.04 | 0.3 | 1300 | 25 | 65 |
anderson et al. 2005 | 0.87 | 0.8 | 9492 | 20 | 5 |
anderson et al. 2004 | 1.77 | 0.5 | 9520 | 20 | 60 |
anderson et al. 2003 | 1.25 | 0.4 | 8239 | 20 | 98 |
anderson et al. 2007 | 0.93 | 0.2 | 4518 | 20 | 36 |
anderson et al. 1992 | 1.97 | 0.8 | 1684 | 20 | 65 |
anderson et al. 1997 | 1.37 | 0.8 | 5496 | 20 | 87 |
anderson et al. 1999 | 1.84 | 0.2 | 2036 | 20 | 33 |
benner and tushman 2003 | 1.05 | 0.9 | 9633 | 23 | 76 |
anderson et al. 1985 | 1.49 | 0.8 | 3727 | 20 | 81 |